Cyborg

Posted: April 15, 2012 in Ciber

For other uses, see Cyborg (disambiguation).

Part of the series on
Cyborgs
Cyborgology
Bionics / Biomimicry
Biomedical engineering
Brain-computer interface
Cybernetics
Distributed cognition
Genetic engineering
Human ecosystem
Human enhancement
Intelligence amplification
Whole brain emulation


Theory
Cyborg theory
Postgenderism
Cyborg Anthropology


Centers
Cyberpunk
Cyberspace


Politics
Cognitive liberty
Cyborg feminism
Extropianism
Morphological freedom
Singularitarianism
Techno-progressivism
Transhumanism


cyborg, short for “cybernetic organism”, is a being with both biological and artificial (e.g. electronic, mechanical or robotic) parts. The term was coined in 1960 when Manfred Clynes and Nathan S. Kline used it in an article about the advantages of self-regulating human-machine systems in outer space.[1] D. S. Halacy’s Cyborg: Evolution of the Superman in 1965 featured an introduction which spoke of a “new frontier” that was “not merely space, but more profoundly the relationship between ‘inner space’ to ‘outer space’ – a bridge…between mind and matter.”[2]

The term cyborg is often applied to an organism that has enhanced abilities due to technology,[3] though this perhaps oversimplifies the necessity offeedback for regulating the subsystem. The more strict definition of Cyborg is almost always considered as increasing or enhancing normal capabilities. While cyborgs are commonly thought of as mammals, they might also conceivably be any kind of organism and the term “Cybernetic organism” has been applied to networks, such as road systems, corporations and governments, which have been classed as such. The term can also apply to micro-organisms which are modified to perform at higher levels than their unmodified counterparts.

Fictional cyborgs are portrayed as a synthesis of organic and synthetic parts, and frequently pose the question of difference between human and machine as one concerned with morality, free will, and empathy. Fictional cyborgs may be represented as visibly mechanical (e.g. the Cybermen in the Doctor Who franchise or The Borg from Star Trek); or as almost indistinguishable from humans (e.g. the Terminators from the Terminator films, the “Human” Cylons from the re-imagining of Battlestar Galactica etc.) The 1970s television series The Six Million Dollar Man featured one of the most famous fictional cyborgs, referred to as a bionic man. Cyborgs in fiction often play up a human contempt for over-dependence on technology, particularly when used for war, and when used in ways that seem to threaten free will. Cyborgs are also often portrayed with physical or mental abilities far exceeding a human counterpart (military forms may have inbuilt weapons, among other things).

Contents

[hide]

[edit]Overview

According to some definitions of the term, the metaphysical and physical attachments humanity has with even the most basic technologies have already made them cyborgs.[4]In a typical example, a human fitted with a heart pacemaker or an insulin pump (if the person has diabetes) might be considered a cyborg, since these mechanical parts enhance the body’s “natural” mechanisms through synthetic feedback mechanisms. Some theorists cite such modifications as contact lenseshearing aids, or intraocular lenses as examples of fitting humans with technology to enhance their biological capabilities; however, these modifications are as cybernetic as a pen or a wooden leg. Cochlear implantsthat combine mechanical modification with any kind of feedback response are more accurately cyborg enhancements.

The term is also used to address human-technology mixtures in the abstract. This includes artifacts that may not popularly be considered technology; for example, pen and paper, and speech and language. Augmented with these technologies, and connected in communication with people in other times and places, a person becomes capable of much more than they were before. This is like computers, which gain power by using Internet protocols to connect with other computers. Cybernetic technologies include highways, pipes, electrical wiring, buildings, electrical plants, libraries, and other infrastructure that we hardly notice, but which are critical parts of the cybernetics that we work within.

Bruce Sterling in his universe of Shaper/Mechanist suggested an idea of alternative cyborg called Lobster, which is made not by using internal implants, but by using an external shell (e.g. a Powered Exoskeleton).[5] Unlike human cyborgs that appear human externally while being synthetic internally, a Lobster looks inhuman externally but contains a human internally. The computer game Deus Ex: Invisible War prominently featured cyborgs called Omar, where “Omar” is a Russian translation of the word “Lobster” (since the Omar are of Russian origin in the game).

[edit]Origins

The concept of a man-machine mixture was widespread in science fiction before World War II. As early as 1843, Edgar Allan Poe described a man with extensive prostheses in the short story “The Man That Was Used Up“. In 1908, Jean de la Hire introduced Nyctalope (perhaps the first true superhero was also the first literary cyborg) in the novelL’Homme Qui Peut Vivre Dans L’eau (The Man Who Can Live in the Water). Edmond Hamilton presented space explorers with a mixture of organic and machine parts in his novelThe Comet Doom in 1928. He later featured the talking, living brain of an old scientist, Simon Wright, floating around in a transparent case, in all the adventures of his famous hero, Captain Future. He uses the term explicitly in the 1962 short story, “After a Judgment Day,” to describe the “mechanical analogs” called “Charlies,” explaining that “[c]yborgs, they had been called from the first one in the 1960’s…cybernetic organisms.” In the short story “No Woman Born” in 1944, C. L. Moore wrote of Deirdre, a dancer, whose body was burned completely and whose brain was placed in a faceless but beautiful and supple mechanical body.

The term was coined by Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline in 1960 to refer to their conception of an enhanced human being who could survive in extraterrestrialenvironments:

For the exogenously extended organizational complex functioning as an integrated homeostatic system unconsciously, we propose the term ‘Cyborg’. Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline[6]

Their concept was the outcome of thinking about the need for an intimate relationship between human and machine as the new frontier of space exploration was beginning to take place. A designer of physiological instrumentation and electronic data-processing systems, Clynes was the chief research scientist in the Dynamic Simulation Laboratory at Rockland State Hospital in New York.

The term first appears in print five months earlier when The New York Times reported on the Psychophysiological Aspects of Space Flight Symposium where Clynes and Kline first presented their paper.

A cyborg is essentially a man-machine system in which the control mechanisms of the human portion are modified externally by drugs or regulatory devices so that the being can live in an environment different from the normal one.[7]

A book titled Cyborg: Digital Destiny and Human Possibility in the Age of the Wearable computer was published by Doubleday in 2001. Some of the ideas in the book were incorporated into the 35mm motion picture film Cyberman.

[edit]Individual cyborgs

Jens Naumann, a man with acquired blindness, being interviewed about his vision BCI on CBS’s The Early Show

Neil Harbisson is sometimes claimed to be a cyborg.[8]

Generally, the term “cyborg” is used to refer to a human with bionic, or robotic, implants.

In current prosthetic applications, the C-Leg system developed by Otto Bock HealthCare is used to replace a human leg that has been amputated because of injury or illness. The use of sensors in the artificial C-Leg aids in walking significantly by attempting to replicate the user’s natural gait, as it would be prior to amputation.[9] Prostheses like the C-Leg and the more advanced iLimb are considered by some to be the first real steps towards the next generation of real-world cyborg applications. Additionally cochlear implants andmagnetic implants which provide people with a sense that they would not otherwise have had can additionally be thought of as creating cyborgs.

In vision science, direct brain implants have been used to treat non-congenital (acquired) blindness. One of the first scientists to come up with a working brain interface to restore sight was private researcher William Dobelle. Dobelle’s first prototype was implanted into “Jerry”, a man blinded in adulthood, in 1978. A single-array BCI containing 68 electrodes was implanted onto Jerry’s visual cortex and succeeded in producing phosphenes, the sensation of seeing light. The system included cameras mounted on glasses to send signals to the implant. Initially, the implant allowed Jerry to see shades of grey in a limited field of vision at a low frame-rate. This also required him to be hooked up to a two-ton mainframe, but shrinking electronics and faster computers made his artificial eye more portable and now enable him to perform simple tasks unassisted.[10]

In 2002, Canadian Jens Naumann, also blinded in adulthood, became the first in a series of 16 paying patients to receive Dobelle’s second generation implant, marking one of the earliest commercial uses of BCIs. The second generation device used a more sophisticated implant enabling better mapping of phosphenes into coherent vision. Phosphenes are spread out across the visual field in what researchers call the starry-night effect. Immediately after his implant, Jens was able to use his imperfectly restored vision to drive slowly around the parking area of the research institute.[11]

In 2002, under the heading Project Cyborg, a British scientist, Kevin Warwick, had an array of 100 electrodes fired in to his nervous system in order to link his nervous system into the Internet. With this in place he successfully carried out a series of experiments including extending his nervous system over the Internet to control a robotic hand, a loudspeaker and amplifier. This is a form of extended sensory input and the first direct electronic communication between the nervous systems of two humans.[12][13]

In 2004, under the heading Bridging the Island of the Colourblind Project, a British and completely color-blind artist, Neil Harbisson, started wearing an eyeborg on his head in order to hear colors.[14] His prosthetic device was included within his 2004 passport photograph which has been claimed to confirm his cyborg status.[15]

[edit]Social cyborgs

More broadly, the full term “cybernetic organism” is used to describe larger networks of communication and control. For example, cities, networks of roads, networks of software, corporations, markets, governments, and the collection of these things together. A corporation can be considered as an artificial intelligence that makes use of replaceable human components to function. People at all ranks can be considered replaceable agents of their functionally intelligent government institutions, whether such a view is desirable or not. The example above is reminiscent of the “organic paradigm” popular in the late 19th century due to the era’s breakthroughs in understanding of cellular biology.

Jaap van Till tries to quantify this effect with his Synthecracy Network Law: V ~ N !, where V is value and N is number of connected people. This factorial growth is what he claims leads to a herd or hive like thinking between large, electronically connected groups.

[edit]Cyborg proliferation in society

This section may contain original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding references. Statements consisting only of original research may be removed. More details may be available on the talk page(November 2007)

[edit]In medicine

In medicine, there are two important and different types of cyborgs: the restorative and the enhanced. Restorative technologies “restore lost function, organs, and limbs”.[16] The key aspect of restorative cyborgization is the repair of broken or missing processes to revert to a healthy or average level of function. There is no enhancement to the original faculties and processes that were lost.

On the contrary, the enhanced cyborg “follows a principle, and it is the principle of optimal performance: maximising output (the information or modifications obtained) and minimising input (the energy expended in the process)”.[17] Thus, the enhanced cyborg intends to exceed normal processes or even gain new functions that were not originally present.

Although prostheses in general supplement lost or damaged body parts with the integration of a mechanical artifice, bionic implants in medicine allow model organs or body parts to mimic the original function more closely. Michael Chorost wrote a memoir of his experience with cochlear implants, or bionic ear, titled “Rebuilt: How Becoming Part Computer Made Me More Human.”[18] Jesse Sullivan became one of the first people to operate a fully robotic limb through a nerve-muscle graft, enabling him a complex range of motions beyond that of previous prosthetics.[19] By 2004, a fully functioning artificial heart was developed.[20] The continued technological development of bionic and nanotechnologies begins to raise the question of enhancement, and of the future possibilities for cyborgs which surpass the original functionality of the biological model. The ethics and desirability of “enhancement prosthetics” have been debated; their proponents include the transhumanist movement, with its belief that new technologies can assist the human race in developing beyond its present, normative limitations such as aging and disease, as well as other, more general incapacities, such as limitations on speed, strength, endurance, and intelligence. Opponents of the concept describe what they believe to be biases which propel the development and acceptance of such technologies; namely, a bias towards functionality and efficiency that may compel assent to a view of human people which de-emphasizes as defining characteristics actual manifestations of humanity and personhood, in favor of definition in terms of upgrades, versions, and utility.[21]

brain-computer interface, or BCI, provides a direct path of communication from the brain to an external device, effectively creating a cyborg. Research of Invasive BCIs, which utilize electrodes implanted directly into the grey matter of the brain, has focused on restoring damaged eyesight in the blind and providing functionality to paralyzed people, most notably those with severe cases, such as Locked-In syndrome. This technology could enable people who are missing a limb or are in a wheelchair the power to control the devices that aide them through neural signals sent from the brain implants directly to computers or the devices. It is possible that this technology will also eventually be used with healthy people.[22]

Deep brain stimulation is a neurological surgical procedure used for therapeutic purposes. This process has aided in treating patients diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease,Alzheimer’s diseaseTourette syndrome, epilepsy, chronic headaches, and mental disorders. After the patient is unconscious, through anesthesia, brain pacemakers or electrodes, are implanted into the region of the brain where the cause of the disease is present. The region of the brain is then stimulated by bursts of electrical current to disrupt the oncoming surge of seizures. Like all invasive procedures, deep brain stimulation may put the patient at a higher risk. However, there has been more improvements in recent years with deep brain stimulation than any available drug treatment.[23]

Retinal implants are another form of cyborgization in medicine. The theory behind retinal stimulation to restore vision to people suffering from retinitis pigmentosa and vision loss due to aging (conditions in which people have an abnormally low amount of ganglion cells) is that the retinal implant and electrical stimulation would act as a substitute for the missing ganglion cells (cells which connect the eye to the brain.)

While work to perfect this technology is still being done, there have already been major advances in the use of electronic stimulation of the retina to allow the eye to sense patterns of light. A specialized camera is worn by the subject, such as on the frames of their glasses, which converts the image into a pattern of electrical stimulation. A chip located in the user’s eye would then electrically stimulate the retina with this pattern by exciting certain nerve endings which transmit the image to the optic centers of the brain and the image would then appear to the user. If technological advances proceed as planned this technology may be used by thousands of blind people and restore vision to most of them.

A similar process has been created to aide people who have lost their vocal cords. This experimental device would do away with previously used robotic sounding voice simulators. The transmission of sound would start with a surgery to redirect the nerve that controls the voice and sound production to a muscle in the neck, where a nearby sensor would be able to pick up its electrical signals. The signals would then move to a processor which would control the timing and pitch of a voice simulator. That simulator would then vibrate producing a multitonal sound which could be shaped into words by the mouth.[24]

[edit]In the military

Military organizations’ research has recently focused on the utilisation of cyborg animals for the purposes of a supposed tactical advantage. DARPA has announced its interest in developing “cyborg insects” to transmit data from sensors implanted into the insect during the pupal stage. The insect’s motion would be controlled from a Micro-Electro-Mechanical System (MEMS) and could conceivably survey an environment or detect explosives and gas.[25] Similarly, DARPA is developing a neural implant to remotely control the movement of sharks. The shark’s unique senses would then be exploited to provide data feedback in relation to enemy ship movement or underwater explosives.[26]

In 2006, researchers at Cornell University invented[27] a new surgical procedure to implant artificial structures into insects during their metamorphic development.[28][29] The first insect cyborgs, moths with integrated electronics in their thorax, were demonstrated by the same researchers.[30][31] The initial success of the techniques has resulted in increased research and the creation of a program called Hybrid-Insect-MEMS, HI-MEMS. Its goal, according to DARPA’s Microsystems Technology Office, is to develop “tightly coupled machine-insect interfaces by placing micro-mechanical systems inside the insects during the early stages of metamorphosis”.[32]

In 2009 at the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Micro-electronic mechanical systems (MEMS) conference in Italy, researchers demonstrated the first “wireless” flying-beetle cyborg.[33] Engineers at the University of California at Berkeley have pioneered the design of a “remote controlled beetle”, funded by the DARPA HI-MEMS Program. Filmed evidence of this can be viewed here.[34] This was followed later that year by the demonstration of wireless control of a “lift-assisted” moth-cyborg.[35]

Eventually researchers plan to develop HI-MEMS for dragonflies, bees, rats and pigeons.[36][37] For the HI-MEMS cybernetic bug to be considered a success, it must fly 100 meters from a starting point, guided via computer into a controlled landing within 5 meters of a specific end point. Once landed, the cybernetic bug must remain in place.[36]

[edit]In art

The concept of the cyborg is often associated with science fiction. However, many artists have tried to create public awareness of cybernetic organisms; these can range from paintings to installations. Some artists who create such works are Neil HarbissonPatricia PiccininiIñigo Manglano-OvalleSteve MannOrlanH.R. GigerLee BulWafaa Bilal,Tim Hawkinson and Stelarc.

Stelarc is a performance artist who has visually probed and acoustically amplified his body. He uses medical instruments, prosthetics, robotics, virtual reality systems, the Internet and biotechnology to explore alternate, intimate and involuntary interfaces with the body. He has made three films of the inside of his body and has performed with a third hand and a virtual arm. Between 1976–1988 he completed 25 body suspension performances with hooks into the skin. For ‘Third Ear’ he surgically constructed an extra ear within his arm that was internet enabled, making it a publicly accessible acoustical organ for people in other places.[38] He is presently performing as his avatar from his second lifesite.[39]

Tim Hawkinson promotes the idea that bodies and machines are coming together as one, where human features are combined with technology to create the Cyborg. Hawkinson’s piece Emoter presented how society is now dependent on technology.[40]

Wafaa Bilal is an Iraqi-American performance artist who had a small 10 megapixel digital camera surgically implanted into the back of his head, part of a project entitled 3rd I.[41]For one year, beginning 15 December 2010, an image is captured once per minute 24 hours a day and streamed live to www.3rdi.me and the Mathaf: Arab Museum of Modern Art. The site also displays Bilal’s location via GPS. Bilal says that the reason why he put the camera in the back of the head was to make an “allegorical statement about the things we don’t see and leave behind.”[42] As a professor at NYU, this project has raised privacy issues, and so Bilal has been asked to ensure that his camera does not take photographs in NYU buildings.[42]

Machines are becoming more ubiquitous in the artistic process itself, with computerized drawing pads replacing pen and paper, and drum machines becoming nearly as popular as human drummers. This is perhaps most notable in generative art and music. Composers such as Brian Eno have developed and utilized software which can build entire musical scores from a few basic mathematical parameters.[43]

[edit]Artists as cyborgs

Artists have explored the term cyborg from a perspective involving imagination. Some work to make an abstract idea of technological and human-bodily union apparent to reality in an art form utilizing varying mediums, from sculptures and drawings to digital renderings. Artists that seek to make cyborg-based fantasies a reality often call themselves cyborg artists, or may consider their artwork “cyborg”. How an artists and work may be considered cyborg will vary depending upon the interpreter’s flexibility with the term. Scholars that rely upon a strict, technical description of cyborg, often going by Norbert Weiner’s cybernetic theory and Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline’s first use of the term, would likely argue that most cyborg artists do not qualify to be considered cyborgs. [44] Scholars considering a more flexible description of cyborgs may argue it incorporates more then cybernetics. [45] Others may speak of defining subcategories, or specialized cyborg types, that qualify different levels of cyborg at which technology influences an individual. This may rang from technological instruments being external, temporary, and removable to being fully integrated and permanent. [46] Nonetheless, cyborg artists are artists. Being so, it can be expected for them to incorporate the cyborg idea rather then a strict, technical representation of the term, [47] seeing how their work will sometimes revolve around other purposes outside of cyborgism. [44]

[edit]In body modification

As medical technology becomes more advanced, some techniques and innovations are adopted by the body modification community. While not yet cyborgs in the strict definition of Manfred Clynes and Nathan Kline, technological developments like implantable silicon silk electronics[48], augmented reality[49] and QR codes[50] are bridging the disconnect between technology and the body. Hypothetical technologies such as digital tattoo interfaces[51] [52] would blend body modification aesthetics with interactivity and functionality, bringing transhumanist discourse into present day reality.

[edit]In popular culture

Main article: Cyborgs in fiction

Cyborgs have become a well-known part of science fiction literature and other media. Examples include RoboCopTerminators (despite the fact that Terminators are ); Steve Austin‘s The Six Million Dollar ManBlade Runner‘s Replicants (which, again, are technically androids); Doctor Who‘s Daleks and CybermenStar Trek‘s BorgStar Wars‘s’ Darth VaderLuke Skywalker, and General GrievousBattlestar Galactica‘s 2004 reimagining of Cylons. Note that several of these are technically androids, not cyborgs (Terminators, Replicants, and Cylons). Other examples include characters from manga and anime such as 8 Man (the inspiration for Robocop), Kamen RiderGhost in The Shell‘s Motoko Kusanagi, as well as characters from western comic books like Tony Stark (after his Extremis and Bleeding Edge armor) and Victor “Cyborg” Stone. The Deus Ex videogame series deals extensively with the near-future rise of cyborgs and their corporate ownership, as does the Syndicate series.

[edit]Cyborgization in critical deaf studies

Joseph Michael Valente, describes “cyborgization” as an attempt to codify “normalization” through cochlear implantation in young deaf children. Drawing from Paddy Ladd’s work on Deaf epistemology and Donna Haraway’s Cyborg ontology, Valente “use[s] the concept of the cyborg as a way of agitating constructions of cyborg perfection (for the deaf child that would be to become fully hearing)”. He claims that cochlear implant manufacturers advertise and sell cochlear implants as a mechanical device as well as an uncomplicated medical “miracle cure”. Valente criticizes cochlear implant researchers whose studies largely to date do not include cochlear implant recipients, despite cochlear implants having been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1984.[53]

[edit]Cyborg Foundation

In 2010, the Cyborg Foundation became the world’s first international organization dedicated to help humans become cyborgs.[54] The foundation was created by cyborg Neil Harbisson and Moon Ribas as a response to the growing amount of letters and emails received from people around the world interested in becoming a cyborg.[55] The foundation’s main aims are to extend human senses and abilities by creating and applying cybernetic extensions to the body,[56] to promote the use of cybernetics in cultural events and to defend cyborg rights.[57] In 2010, the foundation, based in Mataró (Barcelona), was the overall winner of the Cre@tic Awards, organized by Tecnocampus Mataró.[58]

[edit]References

  1. ^ “Cyborgs and Space [1],” in Astronautics (September 1960), by Manfred E. Clynes and Nathan S. Kline.
  2. ^ D. S. Halacy, Cyborg: Evolution of the Superman (New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1965), 7.
  3. ^ Technology as extension of human functional architecture by Alexander Chislenko
  4. ^ A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century by Donna Haraway
  5. ^ Sterling, Bruce. Schismatrix. Arbor House. 1985.
  6. ^ Manfred E. Clynes, and Nathan S. Kline, (1960) “Cyborgs and space,” Astronautics, September, pp. 26–27 and 74–75; reprinted in Gray, Mentor, and Figueroa-Sarriera, eds., The Cyborg Handbook, New York: Routledge, 1995, pp. 29–34. (hardback: ISBN 0-415-90848-5; paperback: ISBN 0-415-90849-3)
  7. ^ OED On-line[dead link]
  8. ^ *Miah, Andy / Rich, Emma. The medicalization of cyberspace, Routledge (New York, 2008). p.130 ISBN 978-0-415-37622-8
  9. ^ Otto Bock HealthCare : a global leader in healthcare products | Otto Bock[dead link]
  10. ^ Vision questWired Magazine, September 2002
  11. ^ Macintyre, James BMI: the research that holds the key to hope for millionsThe Independent 29 May 2008
  12. ^ Warwick, K, Gasson, M, Hutt, B, Goodhew, I, Kyberd, P, Schulzrinne, H and Wu, X: “Thought Communication and Control: A First Step using Radiotelegraphy”, IEEProceedings on Communications, 151(3), pp.185–189, 2004
  13. ^ Byproduct: On the Excess of Embedded Art Practices, by Marisa Jahn, YYZBOOKS, 2010 December 4th
  14. ^ Alfredo M. Ronchi: Eculture: Cultural Content in the Digital Age. Springer (New York, 2009). p.319 ISBN 978-3-540-75273-8
  15. ^ Andy Miah, Emma Rich: The Medicalization of Cyberspace Routledge (New York, 2008) p.130 (Hardcover:ISBN 978-0-415-37622-8 Papercover: ISBN 978-0-415-39364-5)
  16. ^ Gray, Chris Hables, ed. The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge, 1995
  17. ^ Lyotard, Jean François: The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984
  18. ^ Chorost, Michael. “The Naked Ear.” Technology Review 111.1 (2008): 72–74. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
  19. ^ Murray, Chuck. “Re-wiring the Body.” Design News 60.15 (2005): 67–72. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
  20. ^ Haddad, Michel, et al. “Improved Early Survival with the Total Artificial Heart.” Artificial Organs 28.2 (2004): 161–165. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
  21. ^ Marsen, Sky. “Becoming More Than Human: Technology and the Post-Human Condition Introduction.” Journal of Evolution & Technology 19.1 (2008): 1–5. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 9 Mar. 2010.
  22. ^ Baker, Sherry. “RISE OF THE CYBORGS.” Discover 29.10 (2008): 50–57. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
  23. ^ Gallagher, James. “Alzheimer’s: Deep brain stimulation ‘reverses’ disease”.
  24. ^ Thurston, Bonnie. “Was blind, but now I see.” 11. Christian Century Foundation, 2007. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 8 Mar. 2010.
  25. ^ Military seeks to develop ‘insect cyborgs’Washington Times (13 March 2006). Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  26. ^ Military Plans Cyborg Sharks. LiveScience (7 March 2006). Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  27. ^ Lal A, Ewer J, Paul A, Bozkurt A, “Surgically Implanted Micro-platforms and Microsystems in Arthropods and Methods Based Thereon”, US Patent Application # US20100025527, Filed on 12/11/2007.
  28. ^ Paul A., Bozkurt A., Ewer J., Blossey B., Lal A. (2006) Surgically Implanted Micro-Platforms in Manduca-Sexta, 2006 Solid State Sensor and Actuator Workshop, Hilton Head Island, June 2006, pp 209–211.
  29. ^ Bozkurt A, Gilmour R, Sinha A, Stern D, Lal A (2009). Insect Machine Interface Based Neuro Cybernetics. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56:6, pp. 1727–33.
  30. ^ Bozkurt A., Paul A., Pulla S., Ramkumar R., Blossey B., Ewer J., Gilmour R, Lal A. (2007) Microprobe Microsystem Platform Inserted During Early Metamorphosis to Actuate Insect Flight Muscle. 20th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2007), Kobe, JAPAN, January 2007, pp. 405–408.
  31. ^ Bozkurt A, Gilmour R, Stern D, Lal A. (2008) MEMS based Bioelectronic Neuromuscular Interfaces for Insect Cyborg Flight Control. 21st IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS 2008), Tucson, AZ, January 2008, pp. 160–163.
  32. ^ Judy, Jack, Phd. “Hybrid Insect MEMS (HI-MEMS)”.Microsystem Technology Office. DARPA, Web. 5 Mar 2010.
  33. ^ Ornes, Stephen. “THE PENTAGON’S BEETLE BORGS.” Discover 30.5 (2009): 14. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 1 Mar. 2010.
  34. ^ Cyborg beetles to be the US military’s latest weapon. YouTube (28 October 2009). Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  35. ^ Bozkurt A, Lal A, Gilmour R. (2009) Radio Control of Insects for Biobotic Domestication. 4th International Conference of the IEEE Neural Engineering (NER’09), Antalya, Turkey.
  36. a b Guizzo, Eric. “Moth Pupa + MEMS Chip = Remote Controlled Cyborg Insect.”Automan. IEEE Spectrum, 17 Feb 2009. Web. 1 Mar 2010..
  37. ^ Judy, Jack, Phd. “Hybrid Insect MEMS (HI-MEMS)”.Microsystem Technology Office. DARPA, Web. 5 Mar 2010. Quote: “The intimate control of insects with embedded microsystems will enable insect cyborgs, which could carry one or more sensors, such as a microphone or a gas sensor, to relay back information gathered from the target destination.”
  38. ^ Extended-Body: Interview with Stelarc. Stanford.edu. Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  39. ^ [2]
  40. ^ Tim Hawkinson. Tfaoi.com (25 September 2005). Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  41. ^ Man Has Camera Screwed Into Head – Bing Videos. Bing.com. Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  42. a b Wafaa Bilal, NYU Artist, Gets Camera Implanted In HeadHuffington Post. Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  43. ^ Generative Music – Brian EnoIn Motion Magazine. Retrieved on 29 August 2011.
  44. a b Tenney, Tom; “Cybernetics in Art and the Myth of the Cyborg Artist”; inc.ongruo.us; 29 December, 2010; March 9, 2012. | http://inc.ongruo.us/2010/12/29/cybernetics-in-art-and-the-myth-of-the-cyborg-artist/
  45. ^ Volkart, Yvonne; “Cyborg Bodies. The End of the Progressive Body: Editorial”; medienkunstnetz.de; March 9, 2012. |http://www.medienkunstnetz.de/themes/cyborg_bodies/editorial/1/
  46. ^ “What is a Cyborg? “; CyborgAnthropology.com; 18 Mar. 2012. |http://cyborganthropology.com/What_is_a_Cyborg%3F
  47. ^ Taylor, Kate; “Cyborg The artist as cyborg”; theglobeandmail.com; 18 February, 2011; Web; March 5, 2012. | http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/arts/the-artist-as-cyborg/article1913032/
  48. ^ [3]
  49. ^ [4]
  50. ^ [www.forevergeek.com/2011/07/qr-code-tattoo/]
  51. ^ [5]
  52. ^ [6]
  53. ^ Valente, Joseph Michael (2011). “Cyborgization: Deaf Education for Young Children in the Cochlear Implantation Era”Qualitative Inquiry 17 (7): 639–652.doi:10.1177/1077800411414006.
  54. ^ García, F.C. “Nace una fundación dedicada a convertir humanos en ciborgs”La Vanguardia, 1 March 2011.
  55. ^ Rottenschlage, Andreas “The Sound of the Cyborg” The Red Bulletin, 1 Mar 2011.
  56. ^ Redacción “Una fundación se dedica a convertir humanos en ciborgs” El Comercio (Peru), 1 Mar 2011.
  57. ^ Calls, Albert “”Les noves tecnologies seran part del nostre cos i extensió del cervell”” La Tribuna, 3 Jan 2011.
  58. ^ Martínez, Ll. “La Fundació Cyborg s’endú el primer premi dels Cre@tic”Avui, 20 Nov 2010
  • Haraway, Donna. “A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century.” The Transgender Studies Reader. Eds. Susan Stryker and Stephan Whittle. New York: Routledge, 2006. pp. 103–118.
  • Mitchell, Kaye. “Bodies That Matter: Science Fiction, Technoculture, and the Gendered Body.” Science Fiction Studies.Vol. 33, No. 1, Technoculture and Science Fiction (Mar., 2006), pp. 109–128

[edit]Further reading

  • Balsamo, Anne. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women. Durham: Duke University Press, 1996.
  • Caidin, Martin. Cyborg; A Novel. New York: Arbor House, 1972.
  • Clark, Andy. Natural-Born Cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  • Crittenden, Chris. “Self-Deselection: Technopsychotic Annihilation via Cyborg.” Ethics & the Environment 7.2 (Autumn 2002): 127–152.
  • Franchi, Stefano, and Güven Güzeldere, eds. Mechanical Bodies, Computational Minds: Artificial Intelligence from Automata to Cyborgs. MIT Press, 2005.
  • Flanagan, Mary, and Austin Booth, eds. Reload: Rethinking Women + Cyberculture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002.
  • Gray, Chris Hables. Cyborg Citizen: Politics in the Posthuman Age. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2001.
  • Gray, Chris Hables, ed. The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge, 1995.
  • Grenville, Bruce, ed. The Uncanny: Experiments in Cyborg Culture. Arsenal Pulp Press, 2002.
  • Halacy, D. S. Cyborg: Evolution of the Superman. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
  • Halberstam, Judith, and Ira Livingston. Posthuman Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.
  • Haraway, Donna. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women; The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1990.
  • Klugman, Craig. “From Cyborg Fiction to Medical Reality.” Literature and Medicine 20.1 (Spring 2001): 39–54.
  • Kurzweil, Ray. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking, 2005.
  • Mann, Steve. “Telematic Tubs against Terror: Bathing in the Immersive Interactive Media of the Post-Cyborg Age.” Leonardo 37.5 (October 2004): 372–373.
  • Mann, Steve, and Hal Niedzviecki. Cyborg: digital destiny and human possibility in the age of the wearable computer Doubleday, 2001. ISBN 0-385-65825-7 (A paperback version also exists, ISBN 0-385-65826-5).
  • Masamune ShirowGhost in the Shell. Endnotes, 1991. Kodansha ISBN 4-7700-2919-5.
  • Mertz, David. “Cyborgs”International Encyclopedia of Communications. Blackwell 2008. ISBN 0195049942. Retrieved 28 October 2008.
  • Mitchell, William. Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003.
  • Muri, Allison. The Enlightenment Cyborg: A History of Communications and Control in the Human Machine, 1660–1830. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2006.
  • Muri, Allison. Of Shit and the Soul: Tropes of Cybernetic DisembodimentBody & Society 9.3 (2003): 73–92.
  • Nishime, LeiLani. “The Mulatto Cyborg: Imagining a Multiracial Future.” Cinema Journal 44.2 (Winter 2005), 34–49.
  • The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd ed. edited by J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. Weiner. Oxford: Clarendon Press; Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. Vol 4 p. 188.
  • Rorvik, David M. As Man Becomes Machine: the Evolution of the Cyborg. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971.
  • Rushing, Janice Hocker, and Thomas S. Frentz. Projecting the Shadow: The Cyborg Hero in American Film. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.
  • Smith, Marquard, and Joanne Morra, eds. The Prosthetic Impulse: From a Posthuman Present to a Biocultural Future. MIT Press, 2005.
  • The science fiction handbook for readers and writers. By George S. Elrick. Chicago: Chicago Review Press, 1978, p. 77.
  • The science fiction encyclopaedia. General editor, Peter Nicholls, associate editor, John Clute, technical editor, Carolyn Eardley, contributing editors, Malcolm Edwards, Brian Stableford. 1st ed. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1979, p. 151.
  • Warwick, Kevin. I,Cyborg, University of Illinois Press, 2004.
  • Yoshito Ikada, Bio Materials: an approach to Artificial Organs

[edit]External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Cyborgs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s