Multiplicity (philosophy)

Posted: March 9, 2011 in philosophy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Multiplicity is a philosophical concept that Edmund Husserl and Henri Bergson developed from Riemann‘s mathematical concept.[1] It forms an important part of the philosophy ofGilles Deleuze, particularly in his collaboration with Félix GuattariCapitalism and Schizophrenia (1972–80). In his Foucault (1986), Deleuze describes Michel Foucault‘s The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969) as “the most decisive step yet taken in the theory-practice of multiplicities.”[2]



[edit]Deleuze’s philosophy

The notion of multiplicity forms a central part of Bergson’s critique of philosophical negativity and the dialectical method, Deleuze argues in his commentary, Bergsonism (1966). The theory of multiplicities, he explains, must be distinguished from traditional philosophical problems of “the One and the Multiple.”[3] By opposing “the One and the Multiple,” dialectical philosophy claims “to reconstruct the real,” but this claim is false, Bergson argues, since it “involves abstract concepts that are much too general.”[4]

Instead of referring to “the Multiple in general,” Bergson’s theory of multiplicities distinguishes between two types of multiplicity: continuous multiplicities and discrete multiplicities (a distinction that he developed from Riemann).[5] The features of this distinction may be tabulated as follows:

Continuous multiplicities Discrete multiplicities
differences in kind differences in degree
divides only by changing in kind divides without changing in kind
non-numerical – qualitative numerical – quantitative
differences are virtual differences are actual
continuous discontinuous
qualitative discrimination quantitative differentiation
simultaneity succession
fusion juxtaposition
organization order
subjective – subject objective – object
duration space

[edit]See also


  1. ^ “It was Riemann in the field of physics and mathematics who dreamed about the notion of ‘multiplicity’ and other different kinds of multiplicities. The philosophical importance of this notion then appeared in Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic, as well as in Bergson’s Essay on the Immediate Given of Awareness” (Deleuze 1986, 13).
  2. ^ Deleuze (1986, 14).
  3. ^ “Multiplicity remains completely indifferent to the traditional problems of the multiple and the one, and above all to the problem of a subject who would think through this multiplicity, give it conditions, account for its origins, and so on. There is neither one nor multiple, which would at all events entail having recourse to a consciousness that would be regulated by the one and developed by the other” (Deleuze 1986, 14).
  4. ^ See Deleuze (1966, 38-47); The dialectical method “compensates for the inadequacy of a concept that is too broad or too general by invoking the opposite concept, which is no less broad and general [. . .]. The concrete will never be attained by combining the inadequacy of one concept with the inadequacy of its opposite. The singular will never be attained by correcting a generality with another generality” (Deleuze 1966, 44).
  5. ^ Deleuze (1966, 39).



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s